SGH 0.00% 54.5¢ slater & gordon limited

Where's Alex999?, page-38

  1. 4,941 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 147
    Once again, a company cannot sue for defamation unless or if it is an excluded corporation. The Uniform Defamation Laws ensure this. Generally, an excluded corporation = a small corporation, <10 FTE employees, etc. Actions available to a corporation are (*) injurious falsehood, (*) misleading and deceptive conduct, (*) misrepresentation (very limited extent, also some others). Both the onus and the burden in proving injurious falsehood are entirely reversed compared to defamation where the presumption is that the statement made is false, and that it has caused harm to reputation, etc. With injurious falsehood, it would be SGH that would have to prove the falsity of the claim, the harm to reputation, and the actual /real losses that have occurred. Good luck to any of those points being established given all that has occurred /taken place.
  2. This thread is closed.

    You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add SGH (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.