where? have you considered doing your own research instead of...

where? have you considered doing your own research instead of relying on others to spoon feed you?

the actual metallurgical results for Cobra Plains announced on 15 April 2014 had an average flake size of 20 to 75 microns, which equates to 0.02 to 0.07 millimetres.

where as the earlier blurb MackJohn posted said the Cobra Hills flake size was .05mm to 0.6mm, averaging 0.1 to 0.2 mm

in their preliminary exploration, TON appeared to have overestimated their flake size with Cobra Plains by triple times

therefore, if they were wrong in the estimates for Cobra Plains by triple times, what about the estimates for Nicanda Hill?

instead of estimating it was 0.045mm average, they estimating it was 0.15mm average for Cobra Plains

0.15mm = 100 mesh, which is just below the 80 mesh standard

0.045mm = 325 mesh, which is not 'flake' graphite but 'amorphous' graphite

(note: the lower the 'mesh', the higher the flake. 'mesh' & 'mm' have an inverse relationship)

good luck