Where's Wally?, page-148

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument

" The Chronicle of Higher Education that he opposes the argument; he stated that a government can leak information about a person and cause damage to that person, or use information about a person to deny access to services even if a person did not actually engage in wrongdoing, and that a government can cause damage to one's personal life through making errors.[3] Solove wrote "When engaged directly, the nothing-to-hide argument can ensnare, for it forces the debate to focus on its narrow understanding of privacy. But when confronted with the plurality of privacy problems implicated by government data collection and use beyond surveillance and disclosure, the nothing-to-hide argument, in the end, has nothing to say."

So in answer to your question, Yes! I would also suggest that the Jews had a reason not to provide their religious denomination during the war either!

I suspect when you deal with such a corrupt government there are major reasons to say nothing! The Solomon Island Government ordered an Australian to surrender their passport due to the horrendous corruption.

You keep going on about this "great site", recommending everyone dispose of their "worthless' shares and yet you hypocritically still retain your own shares? Which is it?

If you want answers, provide your name to ASIC, state your reasoning and ask for them! Here is the site https://asic.gov.au/complain and let us all know how it goes.

GLTA