"Are they the words OF wotsup or are they the words TO wotsup ?"
They are the Interlinear truthful words that came "to" wostup via the net and "to" you they came = "of" wotsup, the carrier of them to you.
Just like Paul gave the good news "to" the Gentiles and Peter gave the goodnews "to" the Jews
The goodnews wasn't "of" the Gentiles or "of" the Jews
The goodnews -> life in the name of Jesus -> The Word of God. Rev 19:13
The secrete code of Peter LOL -> 1 Peter 1:23 - Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
Lo - Behold, these words which Jesus became the carrier of, The Fathers, are Spirit and Life John 6:63 -> God (Father) is Spirit, hence his words are his Spirit Person expressed.
So when Jesus expressed out the Fathers words, he became the Express Image of the God and Fathers person - Word -> The Word. Heb 1:3, John 14:10.
WHY did Jesus, the 2nd Adam man/flesh not speak of himself -> John 6:63 - It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you (Fathers), they are spirit, and they are life.
Ding Dong, how on earth can Jesus be the word, as his is not Spirit?????????
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- Which Gal 2:7 is correct, OF or TO ?
Which Gal 2:7 is correct, OF or TO ?, page-82
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 71 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)