Unbelievable decision amounting to madness.
A few 7 inches holes take up a few square meters from an Australian owned company producing less polluted energy gets hammered by local/farmers/government decisions whereas 3500 ha of open-cut mining with more polluting coal by a Chinese company get all the loving from the local and government.
You cannot be f.... serious.
Which is better?, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
