i think the problem is your perception of my reply. I was not...

i think the problem is your perception of my reply. I was not lecturing to him and I had no intention of making it look like I knew a lot more than him or anyone.
His question was so, it is just WD?
My reply was trying to justify why I thought it could be either.
My comment about the Imec meeting was simply to put forth my point of view that I think it is not a discussion about the test results because 4DS and Imec were already in it together. What is wrong with that?
You seem to have jumped to his defense when he has not said anything to me. And why do I need to research about a HC personality? Are we in here to talk about issues? Are you supposed to know who the person is before one has to reply to a query? I was respectful in my reply. Do I deserved to be bullied?