Hello once again Stuverine.In relation to your post "A key...

Hello once again Stuverine.

In relation to your post "A key difference with the galvinising compared to the other trials is this one has the backing of the EPA". I'm taking it that you meant (financial backing through the Hazwaste fund) and not just EPA backing (approval). Because the ACL Tasmania project also had EPA backing.

"Prior to moving to the commercial agreement stage, Intec sought and received the advice, support and
approval of the Director, EPA Tasmania and the Burnie City Council. All the requirements that these agencies
placed on the project were then met or exceeded during current operations". And yet I still can't for the life of me figure out why the potential changes in waste treatment policies that ensure best practise which for INL makes a compelling business opportunity with little competition has not yet occurred.


The Zeehan/EAFD project also has EPA approval.

As for having set your expectations a little high, nothing wrong with that. I, as well as what I suspect a few other long term holders have for a long time had the same high expectations. Have to agree though that Dave, Brian, Andrew and others up to the task.

And yes, the limited human resources does seem to pose a bit of handbrake. Anyway roll on next Wednesday and we'll see.

Cheers

Tweaty2