who owns the carbon credits?, page-8

The Lorax,That is what the C.C.2003 Act in W.A.allows and as stated before why did PPPL say that the trees would not be dropped in the six schemes in W.A.that they were interested in that would be ready to drop(or have I missed the good intentions of these companies),as stated before even Gunns is in W.A.

It seriously needs to be clarified,with the administrator and I am of the belief that the land is not the sole sequestration,remember the tree is carbon fibre and H2O,the trees suck up the carbon just like grass,and the yanks version of sequestration is different to what?,well let us see after the big talk fest in Europe.

Though this is speculation ask yourself,why would a multi billion company from the states be so keen to take up the forest plantations that have gone under.

Though not related to carbon credits,why is Macquarie getting into bed with Bendigo-adelaide ?

In all of this the investor needs to be on their toes