Would it be reasonable to assume that if the govt offered a mining lease to AGS/ Heathgate, that Heathgate as the majority owner would have requested that to start the process. The government's not going to offer a lease without a request I would think.
It wouldn't make sense to make that request unless you wanted to go mining would it? Would you want to risk missing out on a mining lease in the future worth billions by not accepting the ML?
Going mining equals massive rerating of share value. Am I missing something??
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- who requested the govt offer a ml
who requested the govt offer a ml
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online