ZedYou have no objectivity when it comes to Uran, you lost a...

Zed

You have no objectivity when it comes to Uran, you lost a stack of money on them, by not having a stop loss in place.

You now bag the company every chance you get, c'mon if your doing well in property good on you, move on from your experience with Uran & learn from it.

Maybe the sharemarket isnt for you, stick with property?

Perhaps you should remind newcomers to the thread of your antics at last years AGM?

The Tungsten is a Plan "B" option, & if nothing else shows Uran is looking at other opportunities outside of Uranium, & why not if it's value enhancing to shareholders.

Ross Kennedy had to step down from his Directorships due to poor health, but he was also with VML (a tungsten explorer), & Tomas Vana (ex Timex Zdice in the Czech Republic) also has extensive Tungsten experience.

Uranium in Ukraine is still the main focus, however the political uncertainty isn't helping Uran progress the JV with VostGok on the 3 deposits we already know about.

Means most likely some more delays, but that's par for the course in the mining sector.

Biggest obstacle facing Uran besides the general market conditions, is the fact they need to get the option money exercised. (This should be a board priority!)

That would net Uran over $3.5m & is crucial as raising funds in this market will be extremely hard for specs.

With most of the Aussies explorers at least 2 years away from production, i still believe Uran will beat most of them.

Ukraine needs foreign investment & ENERGY!