who would pay, page-9

  1. 8,980 Posts.
    HC's services and affability is diminishing constantly. Instead of allowing the broadest possible range of discussion it has cut it down to only ramping about stocks -which was always quite acceptable on the ASX by Stock forum, the ASX General Forum, the US Stocks forum and now the AIM-London forum! Why be so churlish as to disallow political discussion (which, in a capitalist society, it is inextricably connected with the market) but allow other, non-stock related posts, like sport etc? What's the difference? What's the point? Where's the interest? What's the fear in a vigorous, potent discussion?

    If we were to pay for its services then, I suggest, there would be even more complaints and TOUs from woosy posters who can't cope with opinions different to theirs, or with facts and proofs that attack their opinions.
    It happens now damned often enough!

    HC, I'm afraid to say -and I know, I've said it before, is but a shadow of its former self!


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.