Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire?

  1. 96,017 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 75
    Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire in a war? A war which is killing babies, small children and other total innocents?

    Well - America didn't.

    And Australia, being the nappy on the bum of America - although knowing what was the right thing to do - abstained.

    Why? ------------ because we suck up to America.

    Meanwhile, the great Dutto, leader of the opposition - says that Australia should have fully rejected the vote for a ceasefire - seemingly Dutton likes the idea of babies and children being slaughtered - that's ok by him.


    OMG - is it not the best idea to stop the fighting and find a solution - at least to evacuate babies, toddlers and others who are totally innocent? After evacuating toddlers - stupid adults can go about killing each other to prove which of their imaginary people in the sky is the best.

    Yes yes, Israel has a 'right' to protect itself -------- well, to be honest, Jews have a right to protect themselves. Israel has done nothing but to provoke trouble since it came into being.

    Now - it's turned into the thing it hated in WW2

    everyone needs to learn - no baby or toddler had anything to do with any of this - their only crime was to be born - and they weren't given a choice in that either.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-29/government-criticises-dutton-slam-of-un-vote/103036442
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.