Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire in a war? A war which is killing babies, small children and other total innocents?
Well - America didn't.
And Australia, being the nappy on the bum of America - although knowing what was the right thing to do - abstained.
Why? ------------ because we suck up to America.
Meanwhile, the great Dutto, leader of the opposition - says that Australia should have fully rejected the vote for a ceasefire - seemingly Dutton likes the idea of babies and children being slaughtered - that's ok by him.
OMG - is it not the best idea to stop the fighting and find a solution - at least to evacuate babies, toddlers and others who are totally innocent? After evacuating toddlers - stupid adults can go about killing each other to prove which of their imaginary people in the sky is the best.
Yes yes, Israel has a 'right' to protect itself -------- well, to be honest, Jews have a right to protect themselves. Israel has done nothing but to provoke trouble since it came into being.
Now - it's turned into the thing it hated in WW2
everyone needs to learn - no baby or toddler had anything to do with any of this - their only crime was to be born - and they weren't given a choice in that either.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-29/government-criticises-dutton-slam-of-un-vote/103036442
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire?
Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire?
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
AFP
AFT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
Dr. Hartley Atkinson, MD
Dr. Hartley Atkinson
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online