Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire in a war? A war which is killing babies, small children and other total innocents?
Well - America didn't.
And Australia, being the nappy on the bum of America - although knowing what was the right thing to do - abstained.
Why? ------------ because we suck up to America.
Meanwhile, the great Dutto, leader of the opposition - says that Australia should have fully rejected the vote for a ceasefire - seemingly Dutton likes the idea of babies and children being slaughtered - that's ok by him.
OMG - is it not the best idea to stop the fighting and find a solution - at least to evacuate babies, toddlers and others who are totally innocent? After evacuating toddlers - stupid adults can go about killing each other to prove which of their imaginary people in the sky is the best.
Yes yes, Israel has a 'right' to protect itself -------- well, to be honest, Jews have a right to protect themselves. Israel has done nothing but to provoke trouble since it came into being.
Now - it's turned into the thing it hated in WW2
everyone needs to learn - no baby or toddler had anything to do with any of this - their only crime was to be born - and they weren't given a choice in that either.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-29/government-criticises-dutton-slam-of-un-vote/103036442
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire?
Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire in a war? A war which is...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RC1
REDCASTLE RESOURCES LIMITED
Ron Miller, Non-Executive Director
Ron Miller
Non-Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online