''Ha ... it's not that simple. ''
calling for a ceasefire by the UN -------------- is simple, if members voted to do it
one calls for an 'unconditional ceasefire' for humanitarian reasons.
Do you have difficulty understanding what the word 'unconditional' means - if so, which part of the word gives you comprehension issues?
now as far as 'demands' for making ceasefires ----------- let us also get past the bullshit of that 'we don't negotiate with terrorists' -
because clearly - Israel does and America seems to like the idea - so, we can now all drop the bullshit.
Here's the news -------- any human with any amount of decency at all should be calling for a ceasefire from both sides and the evacuation of innocents ------
this is not a complicate concept
whether either side is prepared to do so, is a different issue as they have both displayed an atrocious level of behaviour and a total disregard for young and innocent lives.
my opinion is that the world would be a far better place without both of sides - and america could leave as well - but, that is not possible with such a flawed species. They should all depart the planet and take their all powerful gods with them - never to return
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Who wouldn't vote for a ceasefire?
''Ha ... it's not that simple. '' calling for a ceasefire by the...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CMP
COMPUMEDICS LIMITED
David Lawson, Executive Director
David Lawson
Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Herald