thanks for those answers. its good to hear that there were other...

thanks for those answers.

its good to hear that there were other people in the meeting that interpreted it this way.

i too wondered if they were in and out to ensure that no new price sensitive information was given or interpreted before they could do it the right way.

but i associate "no comment" with the guilty suspect on Law and Order, so i was looking for the good in an otherwise uncreative response.

if they are under non-disclosure terms it will all make sense in the fulness of time.

im pretty sure whatever the play, it is in the best interests of the company, and since i am invested in the company, i am okay with that.

if rfn only share cold hard facts, i guess whatever was seen when in @emails was something that didn't exist at all and should be forgotten. hard to do that though. was interesting stuff.