In the event that we have to raise more capital the 100:1 consolidation would seem to be most efficient.
"Efficient"
What do you mean by efficient
I assume you mean that if or when they go to the market to raise funds in the future the higher the price the better, as each point needed to discount to atrract interest in the cap raise will have a lesser effect on the market cap.
Is this what you mean by efficient?
If not! What do you mean? As without any definition the post seems meaningless to me.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EGO
- Why 100:1?
Why 100:1?, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 314 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares