Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Probably an arbitrary time frame. Maybe they use two quarters in...

First 4 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pugsley100

14,237 Posts.

5

30/03/20

21:08

Post #: 43783981
Share

Originally posted by Reaper11 ↑

We're not far from a lockdown situation. It's 2 weeks for asymptomatic carriers to infect their housemates, 2 weeks for them to symptomise, then 3 weeks of low rates of new infections before any reopening can commence. Clearly any reopening will be staggered over several weeks, so a timetable of about 3 months for the shutdown is understandable. The government is running its narrative on the basis of a 6 month shutdown. I've never heard them articulate where that figure comes from. On one hand they're saying words like "lockdown" should not be used because they cause anxiety, then they're running a timeline that must be causing anxiety by telling people they'll be unable to socialise for 6 months. Does the timeline have any basis to it other than a political purpose of being one that they should comfortably beat?

Reaper

Expand

Probably an arbitrary time frame.
Maybe they use two quarters in their modelling.
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Trump just dropped a 200% tariff bomb. Here's how to cash in

Week 28 Wrap: Tariff chaos back for some reason; CBA holds strong

VMM

'Big tick': Viridis positions for global leadership with Colossus pre-feasibility study

CWX

Carawine faces Fraser Range JV collapse as IGO moves to scrap partnership

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

AAU

Antilles brings Chinese ally on board to keep Neuva Sabana work chugging on

ILU

Rare earths stocks surge as Pentagon buys big stake in US REE miner

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

LIS

'Opens doors': Li-S Energy the first Oz company to produce lithium metal foils

HotCopper Highlights: RIP to Botanix (for now); Droneshield new ATH; Trigg mystery halt

First 4 Last

SPONSORED BY