just looking at this newly presented graph
I've always said that an anteoX inside anode has great results but Ultranode will be the company maker.
from the last few announcements we know that management are now committing more manpower and testing equipment to fast track the Ultranode program.
1000 mAh/g is a great result but will it be the final result
in the last year the CET team have increased cycle life 22% and increased energy capacity further by 24%
so if the trend continues hitting 1000 cycles (11% increase) will have ultranode sitting at >1100 mAh/g
but then with large battery storage, ulranode has to hit around 1400-1500 cycles. what would that leave the energy capacity at?
Arena has given us $4m to reach this after conducting 3rd party analysis.
as I said anteoX results have been great but the data anteo are collecting from ultranode is the reason for the cr and the chatter around about anteo & ev companies looking at funding options. it doesn't look like David and Manuel have bought back anything from their European trip but that doesn't mean that negotiations would have stopped.
the way I see it with Ultanode. in the next couple of months we will have many companies testing ultranode. do any of them want to be left out if a major offers an exclusive offer too good to refuse ?
it depends on how you value anteo's CET and how you view the US and European markets are in urgent need of a better technology, what did ewen say something like, a cheaper, smaller, lighter, faster charging and safer battery.
GLTAH, DYOR, IMO etc etc
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
