why ADO is a multi multi bagger, page-6123

here is my take on these published papers and anteobind payment

I reckon I've seen around 100 of them. quite a few are are on the website.

there have been easily that many behind a paywall, that I haven't been able to fully read

with all of them in a perfect world we would get paid for the anteobind product. we may get paid for some but at a very reduced rate, but most likely free. they only run minimal tests so costs wouldn't be much

that doesn't bother me.

some of these papers have taken up to 10 years to be completed where large sample sizes have been used in multiple countries. this one today was run in Austria with European support in particular Spain. I would suspect that Gautam and Tek didn't even know if anteobind would 100% work for this new technique. it did, so anteotech for minimal outlay had 8 researchers proving the performance of anteobind in a new process.

"The preparation of substrates followed the protocol by Lindner et al. (28) and Schütz et al. (29) Briefly, silicon substrates (CrysTec, thickness 0.525 mm, specific resistance >3000 Ωcm Orientation (100)) were plasma cleaned and then covered by 100 μL of AnteoBindBiosensor liquid for 45 min. The AnteoBind liquid was then cast off, and the substrate was rinsed with 5 mL of Milli-Q water using a pipet. AnteoBind forms a thin (a few nanometers) film on the silicon substrate which is able to immobilize proteins through coordination bonds. (30) Next, 30 μL of a 20 μg mL^–1 Anti-CD9 solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Anti-CD9 antibody produced in rabbit, 1 μg mL^–1 in buffered aqueous solution) was incubated onto a PDMS-stamp. The PDMS-stamp had 3 μm circles spaced 3 μm apart in a 0.25 cm² area for microcontact printing."

anteobind forms a thin (few nanometers) film. interesting

so how does this help anteotech (from the website)

I'll use an example from a couple of years ago

https://www.anteotech.com/wp-conten...ntification-of-human-serum-IgG-antibodies.pdf



there was another paper as well. SIOI and MHRA combined multiplex test. SIOI may have paid for it, but do you think that these 2 papers would have been presented to vidcare and the 10+ indian companies that are interested in anteobind.

here is another eg

https://www.anteotech.com/wp-conten...n-Errors-of-the-Alternative-NF-kB-Pathway.pdf

8o different medical/unis working on a project in many different countries using anteobind

all for minimal outlay. anteotech give anteobind and get free (relatively) research and confirmation of anteobind uses in areas anteotech's scientists wouldn't be able to do. not too bad a deal.

imo, CET work not being paid for is an area of some confusion. but maybe mercedes having to pay and then being named could have caused a problem for anteo doing that.

GLTAH