However, that said, the 7:1 valuation ratio with Ardea should be a screaming anomaly for every person following this sector. All indicators are CLQ is the better project, their economics look better, especially in terms of scale and cost [to be confirmed by their upcoming DFS]. My own analysis concludes a 3.5:1 ratio is more rational, which to me means Ardea would need to double to realize a more reasonable relative valuation to CLQ. I expect ARRRF to hit 3 about the time CTEQF hits 2.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- why clq is not a spec miner
However, that said, the 7:1 valuation ratio with Ardea should be...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SRL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
41.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $36.99M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 4000 | 40.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
41.0¢ | 3103 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 4000 | 0.400 |
2 | 1911 | 0.390 |
1 | 9758 | 0.385 |
2 | 27631 | 0.380 |
2 | 20943 | 0.370 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.410 | 3103 | 2 |
0.415 | 9879 | 1 |
0.425 | 20000 | 1 |
0.490 | 1250 | 1 |
0.495 | 9463 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.08am 29/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SRL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable