a poster has supplied an article here which has explained quite...

a poster has supplied an article here which has explained quite clearly the situation. I have no reason not to believe it
If you have contrary information I suggest you supply it on behalf of your friend. That's the whole point of me asking for it?

The question is it's also been stated that any acquittal was due to the fact that documents had been forged. However the article above doesn't say that I says that false and misleading information was supplied. Of course I'm going to be confused as to what's gone on because we seem to have variable stories. I can't see where there is a problem in asking for any form of rectification over above what's been well reported. Perhaps I've overlooked something and I'm very open to receiving it

Do you think that's unreasonable to ask for clarity? I didn't make this statement i'm just making sure that it's true
So can you offer some clarity because it seems that GBB who made the claim can't and that surely does seem quite unusual