I have been very patient in awaiting any evidence to support...

I have been very patient in awaiting any evidence to support your claim and also from your colleague posting here whose best he could supply was go look at Afr. Which needs a subscription. unfortunately when you usually state someone should go and look at something it's because the inconvenience might hinder their effort. But if they do I've often found what you say is not what transpired . I have had the situation explain to me as " He escaped his sentence by the skin of his teeth by utilising a court technicality".

No I can't confirm if that's true or not but I can confirm you haven't been able to give us any evidence to support your statements and that's never a good sign. Neither has your friend. If you have some evidence to offer I would happily believe it but until then he'll claim appears absent any level of rational merit in any shred of evidence.

Therefore I guess I must conclude based on what's been posted that you indeed were sentenced and found guilty in front of a jury of 12 people. Something I haven't seen object to. An appeal was made and the sentencing overturned but potentially that was via the utilisation of a technicality that your colleague. In the exact same position as yourself. Was unsuccessful in utilising and therefore served time

what on earth are you doing associating with these sort of characters anyway? I would have hoped you would have been smart enough to know better. But apparently these were the types of individuals you were ok associating with . I hope you have learnt your lesson considering how close you were to asic succeeding on your sentencing.

Let me know if you find any proof of your claim as otherwise I can only consider the most trusted source