So you just don't like being corrected? GBB is guilty, GBB is innocent, what does it matter? Which reputable director would get into messes like he does with ASIC? And not like he proved his innocent that ASIC let him go, he had to take orders from ASIC and do something to rectify his wrong doing. Again, you avoided my question why would you want us to believe someone who provided no source to what he claims, and if he doesn't not provide any source what is your reason to say he is reputable and reliable? A court case doesn't support that, where is the reams for thousands of assays he mentions, did you see them? In person? Surely you can dig out what we can't find if you have sighted GBB's treasure troves.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
