Thanks, but that video link weakens your argument, Tony...

Thanks, but that video link weakens your argument, Tony basically said Greg did it on his own, and they don't blame him for not picking up Galium or not doing enough assays so they are doing it again in specific areas. In other words he was a private company that doesn't bind him to any director duties of care as a public company, so it was ok even if it was done substandard - in other words dodgy. But they forgive him.

ETM is a listed company do you think there is even room for directors to cherry pick assay locations and cut corners and be dodgy like that? Tony's comment basically confirms our view in GBb.

Plus we are not attacking him, if he substantiates any of his claims and allegations on ETm I would have considered it, after almost 10 years bickering all he can do is get someone like you to show a video saying his practice in Tanbreez is acceptable because "don't forget GBb was a private individual" meaning substandard. How thick can you guys be to support this guy in his attacks on ETm on some totally unrelated matter, that actually proves that he is a dooshbag? Common mate you can do better. I almost laughed my guts out when I heard Tony make that comment.

Look we are not anti Tanbreez, if Tony gets it off the ground then good on him, GBb use to own ETM, so I say he has an eye on ores, but the big but is his character, I don't trust him in his attacks when Shenghe looked all around the world and picked ETM as one of the few key strategical assets worth spending their time on. And please don't tell me you don't know who Shenghe is and what they do for the China's dominance in the strategic REE play.