Further to my post on 20 January, can anyone explain in a logical manner (without emotional twaddle) why the Vendors & Directors did not fully support the 1 for 6 cash issue?
Why did The C.E.O. not participate?
How can the Vendors/Directors & The C.E.O. give a bullish outlook when they don't put their own money in?
How can they operate the company when they required $7.4 million dollars to undertake their plans but only got approximately $4 million?
Last financials showed they had approximately $4 million dollars cash left, (after the cash issue) but they owe the Bank approximately $2 million dollars. Won't the Bank be concerned?
Does this mean they are running out of cash again?
Further to my post on 20 January, can anyone explain in a...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
