zz
Clearly you haven't read the other thread.
FUND POLLUTANTS
are those for which the environment has some absorptive capacity. Fund pollutants do not accumulate in the environment unless the emission rate exceeds the receiving environment's absorptive capacity (eg. carbon dioxide, which is absorbed by plants and oceans). Fund pollutants are not destroyed, but rather converted into less harmful substances, or diluted/dispersed to non-harmful concentrations.
STOCK POLLUTANTS
are those that the environment has little or no absorptive capacity are called stock pollutants (eg.
persistent synthetic chemicals, non-biodegradable plastics, and heavy metals). Stock pollutants
accumulate in the environment over time. The damage they cause increases as more pollutant is emitted,
and persists as the pollutant accumulates. Stock pollutants can create a burdon for future generations by
passing on damage that persists well after the benefits received from incurring that damage have been
forgotten
- Forums
- Political Debate
- why does gillard call co2 'carbon pollution'?
zzClearly you haven't read the other thread.FUND POLLUTANTS are...
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
VMM
VIRIDIS MINING AND MINERALS LIMITED
Rafael Moreno, CEO
Rafael Moreno
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online