why god's not big on fysical sex and carnality, page-12

we are creatures of habit

not so. it is Sarco that is a creature of habit

Sarco is obviously not celibate

ddzx been joyfully celibate for 26 years


generally speaking, old habits die hard

not so. Sarco's habits die hard


many humans do not grow wiser with age

the Buddha's attained disciples where generally young and not old when they realised the path

for the most part, those current bhikkhus that attained the path did so when they were young

AC's western bhikkhus with the big samadhi were very young when they ordained

they succeeded while many others failed and disrobed into the arms (and thighs) of women

it only takes one moment of insight for a young man to lose interest in spending their lives serving a woman's needs, however such a man must have the genetic makeup

but the experience you are referring to is the natural loss of sexual appetite as you age. this is too late.

when a young man via insight transforms female shaki via empathy into samadhi, the stream can be entered

but this cannot be done when one is old, with waning sexual energy because the young vital sexual energy must be transformed for the deep Samadhi to develop & burn up the hindrances



where does that come from except from realized disenchantment that is associated with whatever, or notever, continues after physical death.

utterly wrong & superstitious. the insight occurs in one moment

when ddzx was 21yo, they were having sex extremely enthusiastically. when ddzx was 22yo, he was joyfully liberated from sex



contrary to your belief, moral compass does not come from genetics - it comes from experience

wrong. it comes from both genetics & experience

many people have experience but their genetic urges are simply too strong to pacify let alone control

Sarco, sexuality active for the past 26 years

DDzx, celibate for the past 26 years

could not be any different. never brothers. impossible