ha hathis is what i was waiting for - as i said in an earlier...

ha ha
this is what i was waiting for - as i said in an earlier post: "the buffett sell signal"
buffett, you do seem to be a bit of a twisted sister,
happy to advertise all of your millions of shares and amazing trades, perhaps to convince folk that you are a legend.
But we all know that (if what you post is genuine) you have lost trucklods on this share (go back and check posts last year)
yes and i read your signature about "sitting tight" and it hit me straight away that something was askew.
one one hand you say you are not concerned whether a divy is paid or not, then on the other, the supposedly subtle comment, "If there was no distribution many traders would dump this stock".

curently holding, in part because i think there will be a divy.
whether there is or there isn't, doesn't matter to me because i'm not just looking at one year chart.
and for the 2nd time i'll go with the trend is your friend
i held fmg when it got pushed back to aroung 2.20
so "sitting tight" does work for the right stock
and the broker is going to get a little as possible in the future.

all very amusing stuff here at the hotcopper kindergarten

good luck all holders