Given that marriage equality already exists as the laws of marriage apply equally to all irrespective of race, sex or religion, let's be honest about what this debate is all about.
This is about redefining the traditional definition of marriage and meaningless 2 and 3 word slogans do not change this.
The onus is on those who wish to redefine marriage to properly explain their case and how any unintended consequences which flow from such a case are to be treated.
To claim that all concerns are fantasy helps to explain the bullying, bigotry and hatred which are so much a part of the yes case.
Why I voted NO, page-193
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 81 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)