Keeping things the "same" means nothing will change.
Both sides of the argument agree that the system is not working now.
A. Libs say that Indigenous are "spoilt" with $30b plus actual costs $3b. So its about the money.
B. Lab say that Indigenous request a "Voice" enshrined in the Constitution. So its about Treaty.
So are the Indigenous entitled to a say when we already have a lobbyist charter? Why not join the Lobby group?
If you were told you own nothing, unable to forge your own destiny
How would you feel.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Why I will say YES to the voice.
Why I will say YES to the voice.
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 45 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)