Did you not stop to consider that if the "same" isn't working, then it's that which needs to be addressed?
This is not achieved by doubling down and locking-in the "same" to the Constitution.
The desired outcome in the the VOICE is similar to what was in ATSIC!
Who would u have greater faith in, Bob Hawke who only legislated ATSIC or Albo who wanted the VOICE in the Constitution.
Vote NO if u prefer and have greater faith in Bob Hawke ability and assessment compared to Albo.
The Coalition prefers to simply legislate and avoid enshrining it in the Constitution.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Why I will say YES to the voice.
Why I will say YES to the voice., page-43
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla