To put it another way, they could have stated that "there was a trend towards improvement in the treated group compared with the controls but this didn't achieve statistical significance due to the low numbers in the study."
Instead they thought it was more positive to present the results the way they did. I can understand that.
Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-1619
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23,878 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $411.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16500 | 6.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6¢ | 2294 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 09.32am 23/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IMU (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable