Solid posts, WW; I agree with you and @Taureanbull's comments that IMU would be aiming for second-line treatment in place of auto CAR-T; however, I do not know enough about the science or how patients relapse and whether there is a priming that occurs from Auto CAR-T that assists with Azer Cel's efficacy. However, I have been reading up on reasons why patients do relapse from auto CAR-T; if you or anyone else is interested, this journal article here and a few referenced within it are beneficial. Cancer is tricky, but allo CAR-T therapy does seem to alleviate some of the issues associated with auto CAR-T.
The comments from the FDA you point out are really interesting. Almo makes me wonder, whether the IMU team knew about the auto CAR-T issues beforehand; I'm sure they did. What is certain is Azer Cel has already increased in value by multiples, in my opinion. They already bought it for a bargain purely because Azer Cel was sold as a blood cancer therapy. However, with OnCARlytics it can potentially treat solid tumours, a market 9 times the size of blood cancers. Now, with classwide black box warnings for auto CAR-Ts, I'm sure every BP invested in them had board meetings around their CAR-T strategy moving forward. I'm not suggesting it's near the end of CAR-T therapies, but given the many benefits of using Allo CAR-Ts, such as Azer Cel above Auto CAR-Ts, it's looking more and more promising. It's even better
First-in-class and potentially best-in-class; in reality, first-in-class is all IMU really needs. As many of the more learned or experienced posters would know, first-mover advantage is real in the pharma world and leads to greater potential revenue. Greater potential revenue = Greater potential present value. One thing that boosts the present value of a therapy is whose hand that therapy sits in. If it's BP, there's even more benefit of being first-in-class. So I wouldn't be surprised if discussions about a potential partnership are underway. IMU could get the product approved, but it'll make almost no sense for them to market it themselves. I like the Genentech/Roche situation; IMU takes care of the science, and Roche provides the funding. One can dream.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Why IMU is a multi multi bagger
Solid posts, WW; I agree with you and @Taureanbull's comments...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,041 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
8.1¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.22%) |
Mkt cap ! $600.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
8.2¢ | 8.3¢ | 8.1¢ | $539.9K | 6.616M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
31 | 1210740 | 8.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.1¢ | 281655 | 7 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
28 | 1189994 | 0.080 |
23 | 1840643 | 0.079 |
17 | 2115671 | 0.078 |
12 | 1000070 | 0.077 |
7 | 238428 | 0.076 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.081 | 163572 | 5 |
0.082 | 515339 | 13 |
0.083 | 1240422 | 8 |
0.084 | 1094261 | 10 |
0.085 | 2317043 | 14 |
Last trade - 12.25pm 06/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
8.1¢ |
  |
Change
-0.001 ( 1.83 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
8.2¢ | 8.3¢ | 8.1¢ | 2159683 | ||
Last updated 12.38pm 06/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
IMU (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online