Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-21429

Truth be told, in the past $4 was a meaningful contributor. His pessimistic view were always backed up with well reasoned arguments that promoted healthy discussion on the downside risks of the IP and company. He was often the reason why readers were able to maintain a balanced view in the face of runaway optimism.

This changed a while back and his well reasoned arguments vanished. His posts began to reflect standard downramp agenda. He cherry picked data and quoted out of context to try prove his arguments. In addition, he discarded simple logic and reasoning from well informed posters and jumped to conclusions way out in left field with no evidence simply because it fit his down agenda better.
I have no idea what he is doing these days, I briefly removed him from ignore to see what he said about a data release recently and he had spiralled even further down the path, so back to ignore he went. This is disappointing, because I used to value his views and asked for his opinions several times on different announcements.
I do have a theory, based on nothing but my imagination. Unfortunately, some RAC holders, among others, have been known to come here and bag out IMU because they feel under threat. I suspect that $4 is one of the types of people, but rather than be quite open about it, has engaged in subterfuge disguised as an Imugene holder but really is only interested in sewing **. I can offer no other explanation a to why an investor of a company would be so bitterly against them succeeding. We all have our issues with IMU from time to time, whether it's lack of communication, PH, CR or whatever. But we get past it and hope the company will succeed , and see that getting closer with every announcement. Not this guy, he's quite happy to wallow in the dregs of negativity never speaking positively on anything related to Imugene.

He loves the argument, so each time he gets replied to he his tank is topped up for another run. While the simple answer is for everyone to stop replying to him and ignore him, that is unrealistic. Maybe he will finally shut his hole when we commercialise. Doubt it though