Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-24987

@Steini,

You note:

- he's distracted with other companies (reasonably in your mind, unreasonably in mine)
- The CRs done without putting any effort in to achieve a better outcome, just to keep them afloat, regardless of any massive dilution
- Hopper's desire the replace retail holders with institutions
- his actions were a "bit unethical"

yet you still invest in his companies.

Why?

He even undercut IMU in that interview ("first was chemo, then external radiation, then immunotherapies, but now the holy grail in cancer treatment is radiopharmaceuticals"). Again, how should that make IMU shareholders feel?

And even if you believe Paul, why torture yourself with his radiopharmaceutical company?

Look at what Telix has achieved with less money and in far less time than Hopper's menagerie.

Look at what Clarity is achieving in a fraction of the time (no 50-99% decline as you seem to think affected all non-income technology companies, in fact, listed at almost the exact same time as RAD, its up over 250% from its listing price, is running 7 trials one of which is in Phase III, and - assuming the trial is successful - will be earning revenue next year, unless it is acquired prior).

Its a mugs game trying to trade on Hopper's shenanigans and requires you to be more skillful than other investors because that's where any money you make comes from. Why not invest in a company that has achieved or is likely to achieve commercial success? The money comes from strong company performance in the form of dividends or an acquisition not by trying to read the Hopper tea leaves better than others ...