Why is it easier to mistrust ISX in the absence of proof then it is to trust?, page-50

1. They were interviewed by the AFR and quoted verbatim. The article is still there and not retracted.The company said on Thursday in response to questions about the ownership of Red 5 Solutions that it could not "disclose shareholder data if we are also not privy to ownership of entities on our register unless it is in an individual's name. "
The point remains why bother hiding something of seemingly no consequence?

Index consideration is a potential answer but we're getting way off-track here.

2. Yes and what else have they misclassified? There is a huge financial incentive to do so.

3. Most companies have followed the rules. I dareso no company has decided to send non-public information via email to a subscription group while being investigated for disclosure issues.The time to act belligerent is once ISX has come out of court case/ASIC investigation sparkling clean, then sue for damages.

4. I really don't see the argument. ISX threw mud in the SoC. ASX threw back a lot more mud than expected.Reputation is already tarnished, you dont get that back by injunctions. You get that back with a public apology after winning in court.

Getting back to the topic at hand - mistrust
Hide stuff. Fight exchange. Not a good look