I am sorry. I am good at math and was good at physics.
But I am never as going to be as good as the 99% of scientists who are in consensus that Global Warming and Greenhouse effects are real.
I have seen the tables outlining the consistent rise in temperatures, the melting of glaciers and arctic and Antarctic ice shelves. That is something I cannot ignore, because it is inconvenient to the way I want the world to be.
If you want an audience to argue with the science then presenting research and papers to qualified scientists would be in my opinion be better than asking HC posters to interpret what you are claiming.
