If you have sufficient evidence to prove it is a good company with great management team bearing shareholders' interest in mind, don't let the illiquidity affect you. Look at Berkshire Hathaway. What is the liquidity for that? What about DDR whose founder owns over 30% and the whole management team owns over 50% and which is a 15 baggers since listing. I was late for the DDR party but it served me quite well in the past 2 years. Both perfectly proves very low liquidity is not a problem. Even LYL's recovery history just 2 years ago can prove iliquidity not the issue.
If you have sufficient evidence to prove it is a good company...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$11.57 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $459.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | $11.57 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $11.80 | 606 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.16am 18/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LYL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable