Still waiting for the nuclear numbers.
Thing is those that are interested in saving the environment have looked at nuclear and decided that it isn't good enough.
Too expensive, too polluting, too long to build, not flexible, enables nuclear weapons, can't find anywhere to build them, too much waste that we can't get rid of.
That's why environmentalists aren't interested in nuclear. The renewable alternative is just better.
Sorry old mate. You're going to have to come up with a new argument. That one has missed it's window.
Just like the nuclear power industry.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Why renewables can't save the planet.
Why renewables can't save the planet., page-171
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 71 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
NUZ
NEURIZON THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Michael Thurn, CEO & MD
Michael Thurn
CEO & MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online