Instead of funding a small army of climate scientists, I mean.
They seem to have reached this settled position (well, amongst themselves at least) and don’t seem to be progressing to the next stage, which is crunching the enormous amounts of data collected to predict what climate change means for our various population centres (ie real world implications).
So why keep funding large numbers of them?
That money could be better spend on applied science and engineering....ie the potential solutions to the problem.
It’s all about the allocation of scarce resources.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Why renewables can't save the planet.
Why renewables can't save the planet., page-149
- There are more pages in this discussion • 93 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
MGU
MAGNUM MINING AND EXPLORATION LIMITED
Neil Goodman, MD
Neil Goodman
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online