Another text that seems to have come from Tonkin's office !...

First 15 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Jeanlucecuyer

265 Posts.

105

20/02/24

19:04

Post #: 72504459
Share

Originally posted by jogo: ↑

I do not understand all the negativity. People seem to be approaching this as if it is a takeover, whereas it looks to me as a genuine merger. The fact that both RED and SLR holders are complaining supports this view. Whether the final arrangement is through RED as the vehicle or not, is only an issue to me concerning matters like taxation, since control of the company at Board level is equally split.
Using figures from the presentation on 5 Feb., I find that both RED's and SLR's valuations are lowered which actually gives space for improvement once the new structure settles down and the merger benefits are realised more widely.
Both companies gain strength in different ways. Substantially increased production, and reserves, increased spread of mines to reduce risk and flexibility, greater net cash plus investments than held by either.

If anything, the current negativity offers a buying opportunity, even if the merger fails to be passed.

Expand

Another text that seems to have come from Tonkin's office !

Rather than these long speeches to justify the unjustifiable offer made to shareholders, why simply not offer them the fair price of their shares ?

Taking into account known cash and assets and known future resources, SLR should be worth between $3 and $5 rather than $1 and if there were to be a compulsory offer, the expertise will certainly demonstrate it !

Besides, why not do this expertise now...???

SLR Price at posting: $1.02 Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
9 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply