why so cheap?, page-7

I got the following information from the Full Year Statutory Accounts (30/09/09) regarding acquisitions.

Call Direct was acquired on 3rd Nov 08 and C10 Communications on the 30th April 09 and their net profit contributions for FY09 were $465k and $234k respectively. If they had been contributing from the start fiscal year, the group revenue and net profit would have been $87.5m (versus $78.5m) and $7.9m (versus $5.9m).

Also, based on the Chairman's Address to Shareholders (25/11/09), it appears their revenue breakdown will be the following when comparing FY09 and FY10 (excluding currency fluctuation between FY09 and FY10 and assuming lower end of FY10 forecast).

Business unit FY09 FY10
Core business 15.7m 15.8m
Dynalink 3.9m 4.1m
3G Domestic 54.9m 29.1m
3G International --- 18.3m
NetAssure 0.7m 1.6m
Call Direct 2.3m 6.6m
C10 0.7m 7.5m
Total 78.5m 83.4m

Is it realistic to expect 3G Domestic revenue to almost halve and 3G International revenue to be as large as stated?