Thank you so much poorinvestor for pointing out this FALSE statement made by puppyish that RAP could well lose its core asset to Pfizer for a pittance if a NO vote.
I feel this statement, which is made with such seeming authority by someone who describes himself as a serious investor owning 5m RAP shares, has made a big impact on many previously determined NO voters.
Can any other well informed person support poorinvestor’s contention and perhaps add some clarifying detail. It is essential that such False information be clearly and emphatically debunked.
Puppyeh’s post was indeed well written with a convincing argument for a Yes vote but if any of the statements in it are FALSE and ‘frightening’, we voters must be aware in order to make an informed decision on our vote.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RAP
- Why you should vote YES - a professional investor's perspective
Why you should vote YES - a professional investor's perspective, page-68
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 141 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RAP (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online