Why you should vote YES - a professional investor's perspective, page-77

First 77 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Taurean7

1,756 Posts.

3054

18/08/22

12:05

Post #: 63187960
Share

Originally posted by scraig ↑

Thank you so much poorinvestor for pointing out this FALSE statement made by puppyish that RAP could well lose its core asset to Pfizer for a pittance if a NO vote.
I feel this statement, which is made with such seeming authority by someone who describes himself as a serious investor owning 5m RAP shares, has made a big impact on many previously determined NO voters.
Can any other well informed person support poorinvestor’s contention and perhaps add some clarifying detail. It is essential that such False information be clearly and emphatically debunked.
Puppyeh’s post was indeed well written with a convincing argument for a Yes vote but if any of the statements in it are FALSE and ‘frightening’, we voters must be aware in order to make an informed decision on our vote.

Expand

Originally posted by scraig ↑

Thank you so much poorinvestor for pointing out this FALSE statement made by puppyish that RAP could well lose its core asset to Pfizer for a pittance if a NO vote.
I feel this statement, which is made with such seeming authority by someone who describes himself as a serious investor owning 5m RAP shares, has made a big impact on many previously determined NO voters.
Can any other well informed person support poorinvestor’s contention and perhaps add some clarifying detail. It is essential that such False information be clearly and emphatically debunked.
Puppyeh’s post was indeed well written with a convincing argument for a Yes vote but if any of the statements in it are FALSE and ‘frightening’, we voters must be aware in order to make an informed decision on our vote.

Expand

The last dot point in the ‘Best & Final’ announcement is simply an extension of the current terms of the agreement with Pfizer relating to possible possible development of a COVID-19 product. Pfizer is licensed to use the intellectual property generated under the current partnership. That licence remains non-exclusive, so RAP can licence use of the IP to another partner if desired.

It has nothing to do with the other intellectual property backing RAP’s established products.

The dot point just provides an additional opportunity for a negative misinterpretation.

Last edited by Taurean7: 18/08/22

RAP Price at posting: 18.8¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
24 Upvote

2 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

BRX

Belararox delineates another porphyry in Argentina at Tambo South

AML

Cultural heritage agreement puts Walford Creek exploration back on the map

Plagues precede widespread power shifts. We’re living in one – and minerals are at the fore

RDN

If you thought lithium was dead, think again. The Pilbara will be central to the next upswing

ASX Market Update: Shares fall flat as GYG soars on debut | 20 June, 2024

SBW

Shekel Brainweigh CEO Nir Leshem weighs in on AI adoption ahead of FY25

FHE

Frontier Energy achieves key milestone for Waroona energy project

EMD

Emyria's Empax Centre chosen for mental health clinical trial

STX

Strike Energy secures $153 million for Perth Basin gas projects

With financials holding the fort, materials must step up with some heavy lifting to stimulate stocks