Yes, it looks like a disturbing side-stepping of responsibility to me.
Yes, of course, anyone can take civil legal action, but how many people can afford the lawyer's fees? Not many ROG shareholders, certainly - we've lost heaps of dough.
ASIC is meant to protect investors, small and large, I thought, not just tell them to go and get a lawyer.
P.S. shouldn't it be resolutions 'passed' - not 'past' in the ASIC statement??
Yes, it looks like a disturbing side-stepping of responsibility...
Add ROG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.53M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.6¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.6¢ | $518.5K | 86.42M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 14637056 | 0.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7¢ | 28756158 | 42 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ROG (ASX) Chart |