Bcash is inferior technologically compared to Bitcoin, not the other way around. Without the inclusion of Segwit, the malleability bug is still present. Much larger blocks lead to the centralisation of the network while not even coming close to the number of transactions Visa or Mastercard can accomplish. These forks are downright anti-intellectual, simply including a blocksize increase, when there are about a hundred less contentious features that could be included in a Hard Fork. This anti-intellectual work is not only observed in the features included in the hardfork (Or lack thereof), but also in the lack of basic code review and testing (As observed with the recent B2X bug [1] [2]).
Much the same for BGold has been observed as well, with pre-mining, replay protection requested to be coded days before the fork (Should have been 2 years + before the fork), not even knowing which chain is the right chain.
These forks are absolute clown shows.
- Forums
- International Markets
- Will BitcoinCash will Replace Bitcoin?
Bcash is inferior technologically compared to Bitcoin, not the...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)