Hi Moose,The remark wasn't flippant, it was an absolute...

Hi Moose,

The remark wasn't flippant, it was an absolute fabrication of the highest order.

I tried to make it clear that there was no fact behind it. The point was that at some stage, despite the enormous promise, and potential returns of SLX's technology excuses need to stop being made for management.

It isn't an oxymoron to say SLX still has huge potential, and a great risk/reward outlook while being critical of management. I believe what MG is saying, I just don't believe/understand why he puts dates on outcomes and then he doesn't give a reason for why the target isn't met, nor acknowledge the delay. This isn't unreasonable criticism.

I'm a bottom feeder, and see value in this stock, although if i was a long-term holder i would have been pissed to see this break 2.

Would love to share a beer. Please understand that I agree when you talk about all the positive price catalysts that could come in the near future. I'm just arguing that 1.22 was avoidable.