Hey Annie.
To your question: That's not my logic, that's essentially the logic path natural justice in this country takes. I'm simply pointing out that we shouldn't jump ahead to steps without fulfilling the necessary obligations in the current step. Nothing more.
Sorry, I responded to your question in sentence one before understanding that it was actually rhetorical in sentence two, with an added 'non binding' offer to conclude.
I personally don't care if you stop or not annie, I'm simply saying that people should anchor themselves to the reality of where this process is and not jump ahead unnecessarily.
That doesn't make sense to me but more importantly it doesn't make sense to the courts who are not interested in people presenting opinion as conclusion - that is the purpose of the courts.
Happy NY!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Will ISX shareholders have a Happy Christmas
Hey Annie.To your question: That's not my logic, that's...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 159 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)