Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

You wouldn't have the balls to say that to my sister in law's...

First 145 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bcr

4,429 Posts.

118

16/08/22

07:50

Post #: 63131440
Share

Originally posted by ddzx ↑

the bottom line is the topic is about will matriarchy replace patriarchy

the answer is "no" (unless there is a technological world with slave women who are impregnated technology)

women are very needy when it comes to needing men

also, as the world becomes increasingly militarized again, men come to the fore

patriarchy obviously arose in the world due to militarism

however this does not change the fact women want to have children therefore they will continue to assert a "matriarchy" based on child bearing

but the militarized-patriarchy will never become a militarized-matriarchy

so for you, its best you go buy some Revlon or whatever cosmetics & paint your face

bye bye i'm busy

i posted a video that appeared to have some food for thought but you reacted to it with the view 100% of the video was invalid

for example, you seem to believe women had protect women from getting raped by African & ex-Al Qaeda psychopaths who flooded into Europe from Libya & Syria

Expand

women are very needy when it comes to needing men

Expand

You wouldn't have the balls to say that to my sister in law's face: She'd knock you the f&*k out!
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 141 more messages in this thread...

First 145 Last